Let’s examine a recent opinion column by Sabrina Szteinbaum. What’s interesting about this piece, though, is that it’s missing quite a bit from what was actually submitted. Take a look for yourself:
It is a possibility that by mid-2014, Iran may have enough weapons-grade uranium for multiple bombs. It is a possibility that by mid-2014, if the United States does not offer its unwavering support of the only Middle Eastern democracy, Israel, it will be terrorized, and a nuclear war could become a reality.
It has been obvious since September that the Iranian threat is at the top of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s list of imminent dangers to deal with. He informed the United Nations of the ‘clear red line’ for uranium enrichment which Iran could not cross, or else. The Prime Minister implied that Israel would not have a problem taking military action against Iran if they reached the point of having ninety percent of the uranium needed to assemble a nuclear weapon. At that point, it was estimated that as early as this spring or summer, Iran could possibly reach that very point.
That was September. Almost five months later, where are we? President Obama’s recent nomination of Republican Chuck Hagel as secretary of defense does not ease many people’s worries about the United States’ staunch support of Israel in the case of an Iranian attack. Hagel has been described as ‘moderate’ and ‘antagonistic’ from fellow Republicans. The speaker of Israel’s parliament, Reuven Rivlin, has made his worry about Hagel’s nomination clear, while Netanyahu has been relatively quiet on the topic. However, Obama’s appointment of Hagel as well as the not so perfect relationship between the president and Netanyahu himself, cannot be easing the prime minister’s worries. Netanyahu has approached the Iranian threat headfirst and with an iron fist thus far, and the president’s wish for diplomacy cannot be comforting.
So Iran gets a nuke, what comes next? An increased threat of terrorism in both Israel and the United States? The risk of a nuclear arms race throughout the Middle East? Could Iran possibly become a hub for U.S. enemies to learn/purchase the same uranium enrichment technology that Iran used to create its nuclear weapon? Or could the bomb just put Iran in a comfortable position to make threats without fear of military retaliation? Nobody can say with assurance what might happen if and when Iran obtains such a weapon, but Netanyahu is trying his best to prevent the world from finding out.
Why should we, as students, care about Iran’s nuclear capability? Personally, if Iran is successful with a nuclear program, my family and friends in Israel will be threatened. Adding a nuclear Iran to their already daily worries of terrorism would not allow anyone to sleep peacefully at night. Many students may not personally know someone who lives in Israel, but a nuclear Iran also poses a huge threat to America. The Iranian Regime has implicitly threatened the annihilation of the United States and the West. The United States Department of Defense reported this past April that by 2015, Iran might be able to flight-test the first intercontinental ballistic missile. Not only would that be a threat to us, but also to our large networks of friends and family here in the U.S.
Meanwhile, the United States must continue enforcing Iranian sanctions. The United States is truly isolating Iran and forcing its leaders to talk about the nuclear program. This month, the United States will not only continue to enforce sanctions regarding Iranian oil, but will also put other countries purchasing Iranian oil at risk of being cut off from the U.S. banking system. President Obama recently signed legislation which will prevent Iran from being able to exchange oil for precious metals like gold, or material like graphite. As long as Obama’s support of Iranian sanctions is staunch, (and his support in this area does look promising) Iran will continue to be isolated and pressured into negotiations.
What can we, as students, do to stop Iran from gaining nuclear capabilities? Building relationships with the people who represent us in our government can go a long way. For example, Rush Holt’s staff contacts us about his involvement with pro-Israel legislation because students have reached out and have engaged with him about the safety and security of the state of Israel. As students, we are responsible for spreading awareness. Only with awareness can an issue be comprehensively dealt with. Additionally, encouraging students to pursue careers in government, where they can make an even larger difference in our foreign policy and halting the threat of a nuclear Iran can go a very long way.
So what exactly do these changes mean? Let’s go through them one by one. First, the description of Israel as the only Middle Eastern democracy was removed entirely. Who gets the prize for the second democracy?
After that, an entire sentence is removed regarding Israeli politics – vital to the understanding of Israel’s position on the Iranian nuclear threat. Why would you remove the opinion of the elected government officials of the country currently threatened by the topic of the opinion piece?
Third on the list of major deletions was half a paragraph regarding Iran’s threat to the United States. Given that the intended audience of the Daily Targum is completely in America, it’s appalling that they would attempt to cover up the fact that we, too, are in grave danger of a nuclear Iran.
And finally, the coup de grâce – the entire final paragraph was deleted. A paragraph all about what students can do to stop Iran from attaining its nuclear goal. Does the Targum not want students to be politically active? To preserve their countries (America, Israel, and whoever else is on Iran’s hit list) and prevent the spilling of irradiated blood?
It would seem the Targum has overplayed its hand, choosing to delete vital pieces of a well-written essay. The 740-word opinion piece was cut down by a whopping 205 words. Is this what we can expect from the new Opinion Editor at the Daily Targum, Amani Al-Khatahtbeh (she also goes by Amani Alkhat)? It would make sense, considering she’s the same person who directly mentioned her support for the BDS movement on her website, thinks that 9/11 was an inside job (55 seconds in), and thinks that the media is controlled by Zionists. And don’t forget, she was an ardent BAKA member. Way to maintain that journalistic objectivity, Daily Targum.